About The Statecraft Blueprint
Government is complex. That’s not the problem.
The problem is that we’re not managing that complexity well. We have no professional institutional capacity for governance design. No systematic approach to architectural reform. No equivalent to the Federal Reserve for governance policy.
So we get:
Government shutdowns (design flaw)
Campaign finance corruption (incentive misalignment)
Policy whiplash every 4-8 years (no institutional continuity)
Gridlock that serves no one (structural deadlock by design)
This isn’t a personnel problem. It’s an architecture problem.
The Statecraft Blueprint is where I document the fixes - as a governance architect with 20+ years of software engineering experience.
What makes this different:
Non-partisan by design - I frame problems as system failures, not people failures. The structure produces dysfunction regardless of who’s in charge.
Specific and buildable - Not abstract “we need reform.” Concrete “here’s what I would build, here’s why it works, here’s the implementation path.”
Declarative, not tentative - I’m not “starting conversations” or “raising questions.” I’m showing you what needs to change and how to change it.
Professional architecture - Like the Fed for monetary policy, like utilities regulation for monopolies - governance needs professional institutional capacity.
Who I am:
I’m Jason. I live in Utah with my wife (a business owner and attorney) and daughter. I identify as neurodivergent with ADHD - which means I see patterns and systems that take others longer to notice. AI helps me translate those patterns into sequential communication.
I’ve spent 20 years building complex software systems, including work with state government. I’ve seen how systems fail and how to fix them.
Government dysfunction is unacceptable to me. So I’m documenting what I would build instead.
My flagship proposal:
The Governance Design Agency - a professional body that designs government systems while legislators focus on policy. Independent. Systematic. Accountable.
Every structural problem I identify is a problem the GDA would solve. That’s not coincidence - it’s the meta-solution that enables all other solutions.
What I’m building:
This isn’t just a publication. It’s the foundation for a movement.
Around America’s 250th anniversary (2026), we have an opportunity for constitutional-level reflection. Not partisan politics. Not policy fights. Structural reform that transcends ideological divides.
We manage complexity. That’s what institutions are FOR.
You don’t need a strongman. You need good design.
